New Ideas and Emerging ResultsESEC/FSE 2018
ESEC/FSE-NIER 2018 seeks to challenge the status quo of our discipline by providing a venue for innovative, radical, thought-provoking new ideas, arguments, and research directions in software engineering. The NIER also incorporates the previous FSE-VaR (Visions and Reflections) track, seeking to spark conversation on the state of the field, especially in light of the 50-year anniversary of the 1968 NATO conference on Software Engineering.
Wed 7 NovDisplayed time zone: Guadalajara, Mexico City, Monterrey change
10:30 - 12:00 | NIER INew Ideas and Emerging Results at Horizons 6-9F Chair(s): Gail Kaiser Columbia University, New York | ||
10:30 12mTalk | Gamifying Static Analysis New Ideas and Emerging Results Lisa Nguyen Quang Do Paderborn University, Eric Bodden Heinz Nixdorf Institut, Paderborn University and Fraunhofer IEM | ||
10:42 12mTalk | The Case for Experiment-Oriented Computing New Ideas and Emerging Results Paulo Salem Dell EMC | ||
10:55 12mTalk | On the Naturalness of Proofs New Ideas and Emerging Results Vincent J. Hellendoorn University of California at Davis, USA, Amin Alipour University of Houston, Prem Devanbu University of California | ||
11:08 12mTalk | Does ACM's Code of Ethics Change Ethical Decision Making in Software Development? New Ideas and Emerging Results Andrew McNamara North Carolina State University, Justin Smith North Carolina State University, Emerson Murphy-Hill North Carolina State University Pre-print | ||
11:21 12mTalk | How Are Spreadsheet Templates Used in Practice: A Case Study on Enron New Ideas and Emerging Results Liang Xu Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wensheng Dou Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiaxin Zhu Institute of Software at Chinese Academy of Sciences, China, Chushu Gao Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jun Wei State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Tao Huang Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences | ||
11:34 12mTalk | DLFuzz: Differential Fuzzing Testing of Deep Learning Systems New Ideas and Emerging Results | ||
11:47 12mTalk | Towards Data-Driven Vulnerability Prediction for Requirements New Ideas and Emerging Results |
13:30 - 15:00 | NIER IINew Ideas and Emerging Results at Horizons 6-9F Chair(s): Gail Kaiser Columbia University, New York | ||
13:30 12mTalk | Beyond Testing Configurable Systems: Applying Variational Execution to Automatic Program Repair and Higher Order Mutation Testing New Ideas and Emerging Results Chu-Pan Wong Carnegie Mellon University, Jens Meinicke Magdeburg University, Christian Kästner Carnegie Mellon University | ||
13:42 12mTalk | Software Fairness New Ideas and Emerging Results Yuriy Brun University of Massachusetts Amherst, Alexandra Meliou University of Massachusetts Amherst Link to publication DOI Pre-print | ||
13:55 12mTalk | Software Engineering Collaboratories (SEClabs) and Collaboratories as a Service (CaaS) New Ideas and Emerging Results | ||
14:08 12mTalk | Towards Counterexample-guided k-Induction for Fast Bug Detection New Ideas and Emerging Results Mikhail R. Gadelha University of Southampton, Felipe R. Monteiro Federal University of Amazonas, Lucas C. Cordeiro University of Manchester, UK, Denis A. Nicole University of Southampton | ||
14:21 12mTalk | Salient-Class Location: Help Developers Understand Code Change in Code Review New Ideas and Emerging Results Yuan Huang School of Data and Computer Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China, Nan Jia School of Management Science and Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, China, Xiangping Chen , Kai Hong School of Data and Computer Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China, Zibin Zheng | ||
14:34 12mTalk | Towards Quantifying the Development Value of Code New Ideas and Emerging Results Jinglei Ren Persper Foundation, Hezheng Yin University of California, Berkeley, Qingda Hu Tsinghua University, Armando Fox UC Berkeley, Wojciech Koszek The FreeBSD Project | ||
14:47 12mTalk | Engineering Human Values in Software: A Research Roadmap New Ideas and Emerging Results Davoud Mougouei Monash University, Harsha Perera Monash University, Waqar Hussain Monash University, Rifat Ara Shams Monash University, Jon Whittle Monash University |
Accepted Papers
Call for Contributions
FSE 2018 call for contributions to New Ideas and Emerging Results (FSE-NIER 2018).
25th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
November 4–9, 2018
Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA
https://2018.fseconference.org/track/fse-2018-NIER
Call for New Ideas and Emerging Results, Visions and Reflections
ESEC/FSE-NIER 2018 seeks to challenge the status quo of our discipline by providing a venue for innovative, radical, thought-provoking new ideas, arguments, and research directions in software engineering. The NIER also incorporates the previous FSE-VaR (Visions and Reflections) track, seeking to spark conversation on the state of the field, especially in light of the 50-year anniversary of the 1968 NATO conference on Software Engineering.
We invite three kinds of papers:
-
Innovative or groundbreaking new ideas supported by promising initial results, such as:
a. Exciting new directions in early stages of research, supported by promising initial evidence, including summaries of highly innovative research ideas recently awarded as large, multi-year grants.
b. Startling new results that disregard established results or beliefs, supporting a call for fundamentally new research directions.
-
Visions of the future, such as:
a. Bold calls to action for potential novel directions supported by a strong and well-motivated scientific intuition or argument.
b. Well-grounded predictions of where the field of software engineering could or should take us ten, twenty, or fifty years from now.
-
Reflections essays, such as:
a. Arguments that challenge or call into question current research directions, ideally leading a rethinking of those directions.
b. Thoughtful observations coalescing the most important ideas from 50 years of experience in software engineering, where they have led us so far, where past ideas have turned out to be right or wrong.
We hope that the ESEC/FSE-NIER Track contributes to a culture that encourages dreamers and trailblazers to share their visions and new research directions, particularly those that connect to other fields, as well as candid, critical reflections and recollections of past and present research. The writing style can be narrative when appropriate. Future-looking submissions (whether supported by argumentation or initial results) might propose pursuit of unusual synergies with other disciplines or explain the importance of applying software engineering to problems whose software engineering implications have not been previously studied. Reflective submissions might clearly motivate a rationale for challenging current practice and/or research in software engineering, or illustrate unexpected connections and themes across prior work.
ESEC/FSE-NIER publications should not hinder later full paper publication; rather, we hope that the ESEC/FSE-NIER papers and consequent discussions will serve as a basis for high-quality full publications.
Scope
In principle, the track addresses the same technical topics of interest as the research paper track. However, authors are encouraged to combine these topics in new ways, establish connections to other fields, and argue for the importance of software engineering research in areas not explicitly listed in the call for research papers.
Empirical results are not required for all ESEC/FSE-NIER papers. Preliminary results or a sketch of evaluation plan may be appropriate for certain submissions, and may help reviewers better understand the scope and potential of the work, but substantial evaluation is not always necessary. Historical demonstration of state of the practice impact, or lack thereof, might be warranted for reflections papers.
Out of scope
A NIER (or VAR) paper is fundamentally different in nature from a research track submission. A NIER submission should not be a full research submission lacking an evaluation, nor a disguised advertisement for previously-published results. Authors should consider submitting such out-of-scope contributions to the main conference or a co-located workshop or satellite conference.
If you have any questions about the suitability of a paper, please contact the co-chairs, Gail Kaiser and Claire Le Goues
Evaluation
All papers will be evaluated in terms of the following criteria.
-
Soundness: the submission makes a coherent argument, substantiated by historical analysis, cogent analytical argument, or appropriately-scoped initial empirical results.
-
Originality or potential for impact: the submission presents a particularly novel collation of historical work, insight or approach towards new/future work, and/or is potentially disruptive of current practice or common knowledge.
-
Scholarship: the submission appropriately considers and puts itself in context with respect to the relevant literature.
Submission and Publication
In the submission form, authors must clearly identify their paper as one of
- Early Results
- Visions (of the future)
- Reflections (on the past)
A submission must conform at the time of submission to the ESEC/FSE 2018 submission and formatting instructions. Submissions must not exceed four pages, including all text, appendices, and figures. One more page containing only references is permitted. Papers must be submitted electronically at the ESEC/FSE EasyChair submission site by the deadline.
ESEC/FSE-NIER will employ the same double-blind review process as the main research track. Submissions must not reveal authors’ identities; consult the main research track CfP for more details on appropriate anonymization practices.
Submissions that do not comply with these instructions may be rejected without review.
Note that the official publication date is the date the proceedings are made available in the ACM Digital Library. This date may be up to two weeks prior to the first day of ESEC/FSE 2018. The official publication date affects the deadline for any patent filings related to published work.
Authors of accepted papers should also create a poster describing their work. Authors will present their work via a talk and a poster session.
At least one author of each accepted paper must register and present the paper at ESEC/FSE 2018 in order for the paper to be published in the proceedings. One-day registrations do not satisfy the registration requirement. Please carefully read the complete list of ESEC/FSE Submission Policies and Policies for Accepted Contributions.
Important dates
- Submission Deadline: Friday, June 15, 2018
- Notification: July 25, 2018
- Camera ready: September 14, 2018
NIER Co-Chairs
Gail Kaiser, Columbia University, USA
Claire Le Goues, Carnegie Mellon University, USA